Mike Thomas : 1983
332.4 m surveyed this year.
Other years: | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1989
Wallet status | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1989
Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date
| Date | Trips | Surveys | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 25, 1983 | 132=142 Monday | 132=142 Monday | |||
| July 27, 1983 | surveying |
surveying |
|||
| July 28, 1983 | Prospecting below Vd. Schwartzmooskogel | Prospecting below Vd. Schwartzmooskogel | |||
| July 31, 1983 | Cave marked (4) on Planc's sketch. 136 | Cave marked (4) on Planc's sketch. 136 | |||
| Aug. 1, 1983 | Hole no. (4) Steinschlagschacht 136 | Hole no. (4) Steinschlagschacht 136 | |||
| Aug. 4, 1983 | Steinschlagschacht 136 | Steinschlagschacht 136 | |||
| Aug. 5, 1983 | Salzburg - Friday 5th Mass Jacking Day | Salzburg | |||
| Aug. 7, 1983 | Streambeds | Streambeds | |||
| Aug. 8, 1983 | 136 - Steinschlag | 136 | |||
| Aug. 9, 1983 | SURFACE SURVEYING / ROPE REMOVING | SURFACE SURVEYING / ROPE REMOVING | |||
| Aug. 10, 1983 | Derigging team | Derigging team | part3 | 332.4 m | |
Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!
WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.
The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here.
I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system
instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls
get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py
To be fixed!
What we now know
The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)