Mike Thomas : 1983

332.4 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1989

Wallet status | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1989

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
July 25, 1983 132=142 Monday 132=142 Monday
July 27, 1983 surveying 132 142 Wed 27th surveying 132 142 Wed 27th
July 28, 1983 Prospecting below Vd. Schwartzmooskogel Prospecting below Vd. Schwartzmooskogel
July 31, 1983 Cave marked (4) on Planc's sketch. 136 Cave marked (4) on Planc's sketch. 136
Aug. 1, 1983 Hole no. (4) Steinschlagschacht 136 Hole no. (4) Steinschlagschacht 136
Aug. 4, 1983 Steinschlagschacht 136 Steinschlagschacht 136
Aug. 5, 1983 Salzburg - Friday 5th Mass Jacking Day Salzburg
Aug. 7, 1983 Streambeds Streambeds
Aug. 8, 1983 136 - Steinschlag 136
Aug. 9, 1983 SURFACE SURVEYING / ROPE REMOVING SURFACE SURVEYING / ROPE REMOVING
Aug. 10, 1983 Derigging team Derigging team part3 332.4 m

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)