Rob Watson : 2014

627.4 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 2014 | 2016 | 2017

Wallet status | 2014 | 2016 | 2017

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
July 29, 2014 Rig 161g UNKNOWN
July 30, 2014 161 - Reconnaisance trip to Runnel Stone 161
Aug. 1, 2014 Surface prospecting, NW of Tunnocks UNKNOWN
Aug. 2, 2014 107 - Gemshohle - Attempt #2 to push Wookey & Jess' lead at North end of China 107 161connection 55.0 m
Aug. 3, 2014 107 - KH connection made / KH derig 107
Aug. 11, 2014 Tunnocks - Arctic Angle - "The wrong choice" Tunnocks nochoiceatall 80.8 m
-- feckingtight 49.2 m
Aug. 12, 2014 deadbatpitch 32.2 m
Aug. 13, 2014 Balcony Höhle Pushing minor leads near entrance pitch UNKNOWN roommop 10.8 m
-- crashmop 131.8 m
Aug. 14, 2014 Tunnocks - Number of the Beast Tunnocks
Aug. 18, 2014 Balcony - Tying up loose ends in Far Side Balcony farsideco1 15.5 m
-- farsideco2 43.2 m
-- farsideco3 46.8 m
-- farsideco4 46.3 m
-- farsideco5 65.5 m
-- turtleheadco 50.3 m
Aug. 19, 2014 Leads at the bottom of Champagne on Ice / Arctic Angle, Grike Expectation UNKNOWN

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)