Rachel Turnbull : 2017

1135.4 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 2015 | 2017 | 2018

Wallet status | 2015 | 2017 | 2018

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

July 19, 2017 Balcony - Natural Highs Balcony
July 21, 2017 Balcony - destroying Galactica Balcony galactica 305.8 m
July 27, 2017 nothingtosee3 127.1 m
July 28, 2017 plateau - Prospecting, 110 area plateau
July 31, 2017 Tunnocks - Underground camp, Snake Pit, Snake Charmer 2 and 3 Tunnocks snakecharmer2 192.4 m
Aug. 1, 2017 snakecharmer3 99.6 m
Aug. 2, 2017 Balcony - not finding Sloppy Seconds, touristing, flooding Balcony
Aug. 7, 2017 Tunnocks - Camp Kraken: killing Grike of the Earth Tunnocks theloserlido 262.9 m
Aug. 8, 2017 bahamastunnel 50.1 m
-- unfathomablestupidity 38.6 m
Aug. 10, 2017 Balcony - Cathedral Chasm and Dark Arts Balcony naturecalls 59.0 m
Aug. 14, 2017 Tunnocks - Camp Kraken derig Tunnocks

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)