Noel Snape : 2014

1504.8 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 2009 | 2011 | 2012 | 2014

Wallet status | 2009 | 2011 | 2012 | 2014

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
Aug. 4, 2014 2005-05 Balcony Höhle UNKNOWN roomwithaview2 81.5 m
-- Tunnocks THE BEAST UNKNOWN smashcrashpassage 104.4 m
Aug. 5, 2014 2005-05 Balcony Höhle UNKNOWN entrancepitch2 61.8 m
-- entrancepitch2 61.8 m
-- entrancepitch2 61.8 m
-- pitpot 13.5 m
Aug. 7, 2014 2005-05 Balcony Höhle UNKNOWN pitpot2 73.6 m
-- Balcony Höhle: Traversing + dropping Pit Pot UNKNOWN
Aug. 8, 2014 107 - derig 107
Aug. 11, 2014 Tunnocks - Arctic Angle - "The wrong choice" Tunnocks thewrongchoice 141.4 m
-- nochoiceatall2 31.3 m
Aug. 13, 2014 Balcony Höhle Pushing minor leads near entrance pitch UNKNOWN roommop 10.8 m
-- crashmop 131.8 m
Aug. 14, 2014 Tunnocks - Number of the Beast Tunnocks
Aug. 17, 2014 Balcony - The Far Side Balcony farside 513.9 m
Aug. 18, 2014 Balcony Höhle, Turtlehead passage UNKNOWN turtlehead 340.8 m
-- turtlehead 340.8 m

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)