Luke Stangroom : 2016

977.6 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018

Wallet status | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
June 27, 2016 Balkonhöhle - Bipedal Balkonhöhle
June 28, 2016 Tunnocks - entrance rerig Tunnocks fatmanscoop 42.6 m
June 29, 2016 Balkonhöhle - Dig Dug Pitch Balkonhöhle
July 2, 2016 Tunnocks - Champagne on Ice - Rigging Daft Choice beyond Straight Choice Exposed Tunnocks daftchoice 245.6 m
July 3, 2016 Looking for 2nd Balkonhöhle entrance (dropping 2010-04) UNKNOWN
July 6, 2016 wrongway 97.2 m
July 7, 2016 Tunnocks Camp UNKNOWN slackers6 31.2 m
July 8, 2016 wrongcustard 50.5 m
-- slackers7 40.6 m
-- lobsterpot 93.2 m
July 9, 2016 kippercock 135.3 m
-- indianropetrick 58.7 m
July 11, 2016 Balcony - Long Drop Balcony
July 12, 2016 Balkon - Gosser Wager Balkon
July 16, 2016 Tunnocks - Champagne on Ice Tunnocks
-- Tunnocks - Champagne on Ice derig Tunnocks
July 17, 2016 Hilti a Plenty - Pushing and Evening Breakthrough Hilti a Plenty cant_stop_bat_country 182.6 m

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)