Julian Todd : 2007

351.1 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1993 | 1996 | 1999 | 2000 | 2003 | 2004 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016

Wallet status | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1993 | 1996 | 1999 | 2000 | 2003 | 2004 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
July 29, 2007 Via Ferrata - Loser Klettersteig Via Ferrata
July 30, 2007 204 - Gaffered -> The Wares -> Software 204 software3 29.8 m
-- software3 29.8 m
July 31, 2007 204 - Razordance -> push horizontal leads. Combined push, survey, photo + derig trip. Sigh. 204
Aug. 14, 2007 Maximum Pleasure survey in Tunnockschacht UNKNOWN literalnorth4 38.8 m
-- maxpleasure5 46.8 m
-- justforalaugh 144.4 m
-- letsgetnaked 91.2 m
Aug. 15, 2007 Packing Steinbruckenhoehle Bivvy UNKNOWN

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)