David Walker : 2014

411.6 m surveyed this year.

Other years:  | 2014 | 2015 | 2016

Wallet status | 2014 | 2015 | 2016

Table of all trips and surveys aligned by date

DateTripsSurveys
July 27, 2014 107: Alcove pop + Nipped down UNKNOWN
Aug. 1, 2014 107 - Gemshohle - Attempt to push Wookey & Jess' lead at North end of China 107
Aug. 2, 2014 107 - Gemshohle - Attempt #2 to push Wookey & Jess' lead at North end of China 107 161connection 55.0 m
Aug. 3, 2014 2014-NEO-01 UNKNOWN 273 13.8 m
Aug. 4, 2014 entcleads 17.5 m
-- fudgedup 22.3 m
Aug. 5, 2014 2014-sd-01 60.9 m
Aug. 6, 2014 Balcony Höhle: Room with a View UNKNOWN
Aug. 11, 2014 Tunnocks - Arctic Angle - "The wrong choice" Tunnocks nochoiceatall 80.8 m
-- generalscrot 21.3 m
Aug. 12, 2014 lemonsnoutrosyringpiece 30.0 m
-- pointlesssniffing 7.3 m
Aug. 14, 2014 darkartsiii 34.2 m
-- scrottytubei 8.8 m
-- scrottytubeii 27.1 m
-- hiltiaplenty 32.4 m

Horrible bug here but only when there is more than one survex block per day, or is there ?!

WHat we thought was the bug: e.g. see Wookey 1999 where there are 3 eiscream survex blocks on 5th August. it duplicates the entry but gets it wrong. The length from the first block is displayed twice but there should be 3 rows: eiscream, eiscream2, eiscream3.

The interaction of django database query idioms with django HTML templating language is a bit impenetrable here. I blame Aaron Curtis who was too fond of being clever with the Django templating system instead or writing it in python anyone could understand.
- The template is in troggle/templates/personexpedition.html
- The code is in function personexpedition() which calls get_person_chronology() in troggle/core/views/logbooks.py
- the connection between the two is made in the URL resolver in troggle/urls.py

To be fixed!

What we now know

The eiscream.svx file does indeed record 3 blocks: eiscream, eiscream2 & eiscream3. But (more) careful inspection shows that eiscream2 and eiscream3 are in the year 2000, not in 1999. So they absolutely should not be shown here. So maybe everything is correct after all. (Well, apart from the duplication.)